crystal falace 2:04 Tue Aug 6
Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
|
Just having a nosey on bet365 at some potential bets for the season and was a bit staggered to see we are at 11/1 to basiclally be "best of the rest" this season, everton, wolves and leicester are all 10/3 or 7/2 so the gap in price seems huge to me.
Might just be a bet365 blindpot though as looking on skybet i couldnt find the same market but we were 13/2 to actually finish in the top 6.
Fill ya boots as they say
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
147man
2:07 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
So you're saying we are 11-1 to finish 7th?
With our defence I'd want about 50-1
|
Takashi Miike
2:11 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
with just two proper strikers and the lack of options at CM, 11/1 is taking the piss
|
Block
2:12 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
66/1 to finish above Chelsea.
Thank me later.
|
AKA ERNIE
2:14 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
should be 50/1 to finish 7th
|
scouse kid
2:26 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
I noticed in the Racing Post pull out thing. That football trader from sky bet fancied us to have a good season. Obviously the bet 365 traders don't rate us. Which is why sky bet are shorter.
|
White Pony
2:30 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Pretty much any pre-season predictions I've read have all had Wolves, Everton and Leicester as the best of the rest.
I'm comfortable with us being under the radar in that respect.
|
El Scorchio
2:36 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Everton seem a good bet.
Big summer again for them, especially if they sign Zaha. Quietly building what could be a spurs level team.
|
lufbra iron
2:36 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Block wrote...
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
66/1 to finish above Chelsea.
66/1????
do you mean 6/1?
if you have seen 66's i need to know where
|
scott_d
2:37 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
I can't see Wolves being anywhere near as good as last season.
Good little set-up and over-achieved next season but should they qualify for the Europa League there is no way they can compete in both.
What could be really embarrassing for them though is if they bring out a third kit especially for Europe and then fail to qualify - but that would be pretty stupid, wouldn't it?
|
Johnson
2:46 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
If it is 66s I’ll be LUMPING ON.
Let us know Block.
|
crystal falace
2:48 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Wolves surely wont have the same luck with injuries again as last season, and they dotn have much of a squad behind their good starting 11, factor in the extra european games and trips and i thinkt hey'll be falling off slightly.
Leicester havent really improved from last year in my eyes, dont think too highly of Perez and they signed Tielemans who they had for half of last season anyway, now they've lost Maguire
Everton are the ones who i think could be due for a big season but again they'll be depening on new players coming in and hitting the ground running like we are, losing Gueye to PSG could be big for them.
I do think that these 3 teams along with us will distance ourselves from the bottom half of the league this season, just makes me wonder why we are sucvh longer odds than them
|
gank
3:01 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Block has made that up for attention, the fucking Rod Hull CUNT.
|
,
3:02 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
It looks like business has been done for us regarding strengthening our first eleven and that being the case I think that we’ll finish next season in tenth place.
It will be the usual top six, of which Man City and Liverpool will be clearly better than the other four, and below the top six will be us, Leicester, Wolves and Everton. We will be the bottom of this group of four.
|
Grumpster
3:31 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Bookies aren't stupid, they can still see how suspect our defence is and that if Haller doesn't fire, we pretty much have fuck all else up front with Hernandez being more of an impact sub man.
|
Block
3:33 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
gank 3:01 Tue Aug 6
William Hill
This was a couple weeks back, however.
Fill yer boots
|
stewie griffin
3:36 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
William BEARD
|
lufbra iron
3:39 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
just checked Hills
10's
|
bill green
3:40 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
might get a better price on us after the first game is out of the way... just sayin
|
crystal falace
3:45 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Grumpster 3:31 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
Bookies aren't stupid, they can still see how suspect our defence is and that if Haller doesn't fire, we pretty much have fuck all else up front with Hernandez being more of an impact sub man.
Yeah i get that but Skybet have us 13/2 to actually make the top 6, so 11/1 to finish 7th just seems huge to me
|
,
3:47 Tue Aug 6
Re: Betting W/O "the big 6"
|
Finishing with a positive goal difference would be a good aim.
|
| 
